<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guide to Improving Laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bicycledriving.org/law/guide-to-improving-laws/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bicycledriving.org</link>
	<description>Cycling skills, good roads, public awareness.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:01:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Foster</title>
		<link>http://bicycledriving.org/law/guide-to-improving-laws/comment-page-1#comment-2693</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicycledriving.org/law/guide-to-improving-laws#comment-2693</guid>
		<description>FYI - NJ&#039;s helmet law now requires them for persons under age 17.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI &#8211; NJ&#8217;s helmet law now requires them for persons under age 17.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry McAfee</title>
		<link>http://bicycledriving.org/law/guide-to-improving-laws/comment-page-1#comment-1969</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry McAfee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicycledriving.org/law/guide-to-improving-laws#comment-1969</guid>
		<description>A bicyclist who is at fault in a car / bike collision and damages the car is typically covered by his homeowner or renter insurance. If the bicyclist adds a small motor to his bicycle, he is not covered. He needs to get a rider for his homeowner policy or his auto insurance policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bicyclist who is at fault in a car / bike collision and damages the car is typically covered by his homeowner or renter insurance. If the bicyclist adds a small motor to his bicycle, he is not covered. He needs to get a rider for his homeowner policy or his auto insurance policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Beighe</title>
		<link>http://bicycledriving.org/law/guide-to-improving-laws/comment-page-1#comment-1950</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Beighe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicycledriving.org/law/guide-to-improving-laws#comment-1950</guid>
		<description>In Idaho, cyclists may treat a stop like a yield sign, apparently for a looong time (1982).

Now similar legislation is pending in Arizona, Montana, and Oregon.
http://azbikelaw.org/blog/bicycle-stop-sign-changes-proposed/

Idaho also more recently allow cyclists to proceed through a red signal after a full stop is no traffic is present. None of current pending legislation has this feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Idaho, cyclists may treat a stop like a yield sign, apparently for a looong time (1982).</p>
<p>Now similar legislation is pending in Arizona, Montana, and Oregon.<br />
<a href="http://azbikelaw.org/blog/bicycle-stop-sign-changes-proposed/" rel="nofollow">http://azbikelaw.org/blog/bicycle-stop-sign-changes-proposed/</a></p>
<p>Idaho also more recently allow cyclists to proceed through a red signal after a full stop is no traffic is present. None of current pending legislation has this feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Beighe</title>
		<link>http://bicycledriving.org/law/guide-to-improving-laws/comment-page-1#comment-1645</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Beighe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicycledriving.org/law/guide-to-improving-laws#comment-1645</guid>
		<description>Paul,
There&#039;s been a veritable explosion of passing-distance laws, 12 by my count. I think i have them all listed here:

http://azbikelaw.org/blog/three-foot-passing-laws/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,<br />
There&#8217;s been a veritable explosion of passing-distance laws, 12 by my count. I think i have them all listed here:</p>
<p><a href="http://azbikelaw.org/blog/three-foot-passing-laws/" rel="nofollow">http://azbikelaw.org/blog/three-foot-passing-laws/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arizona Bike Law Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cycling on One-way streets</title>
		<link>http://bicycledriving.org/law/guide-to-improving-laws/comment-page-1#comment-1644</link>
		<dc:creator>Arizona Bike Law Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cycling on One-way streets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicycledriving.org/law/guide-to-improving-laws#comment-1644</guid>
		<description>[...] to BicycleDriving.com&#8217;s Guide to Improving Laws , only 4 states (AZ, SD, TN, UT) lack this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to BicycleDriving.com&#8217;s Guide to Improving Laws , only 4 states (AZ, SD, TN, UT) lack this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jakob Helmboldt</title>
		<link>http://bicycledriving.org/law/guide-to-improving-laws/comment-page-1#comment-1161</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakob Helmboldt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicycledriving.org/law/guide-to-improving-laws#comment-1161</guid>
		<description>Virginia&#039;s mandatory sidepath law allowed localities to adopt the provision (it was not uniform) and it was repealed several years ago.  Some localities have not repealed the provisions, though the enabling legislation no longer exists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virginia&#8217;s mandatory sidepath law allowed localities to adopt the provision (it was not uniform) and it was repealed several years ago.  Some localities have not repealed the provisions, though the enabling legislation no longer exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://bicycledriving.org/law/guide-to-improving-laws/comment-page-1#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 04:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicycledriving.org/law/guide-to-improving-laws#comment-809</guid>
		<description>Some of the information you provide is not correct for the state of Ohio.  For example, in Ohio, we have the ride to the right law with the 5 exceptions, missing the speed rule and one-way rule. 

You mention Colorado and Iowa as permitting regulating bicycle operation but add that the regulations must be  consistent with state law. The same is true with Ohio. 

Ohio no longer requires reflectors be visible from the side. Nor does Ohio require a front white reflector. Ohio has the same laws as California that you have written. A front light must be visible from the side and that the light only needs to be produced while in motion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the information you provide is not correct for the state of Ohio.  For example, in Ohio, we have the ride to the right law with the 5 exceptions, missing the speed rule and one-way rule. </p>
<p>You mention Colorado and Iowa as permitting regulating bicycle operation but add that the regulations must be  consistent with state law. The same is true with Ohio. </p>
<p>Ohio no longer requires reflectors be visible from the side. Nor does Ohio require a front white reflector. Ohio has the same laws as California that you have written. A front light must be visible from the side and that the light only needs to be produced while in motion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Brooking</title>
		<link>http://bicycledriving.org/law/guide-to-improving-laws/comment-page-1#comment-805</link>
		<dc:creator>John Brooking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicycledriving.org/law/guide-to-improving-laws#comment-805</guid>
		<description>Also, Maine (ME) improved its Ride-To-The-Right statute in Summer 2007 to include the missing exceptions for hazards, speed, passing, and left turns. Reference http://janus.state.me.us/legis/statutes/29-a/title29-Asec2063.html.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, Maine (ME) improved its Ride-To-The-Right statute in Summer 2007 to include the missing exceptions for hazards, speed, passing, and left turns. Reference <a href="http://janus.state.me.us/legis/statutes/29-a/title29-Asec2063.html." rel="nofollow">http://janus.state.me.us/legis/statutes/29-a/title29-Asec2063.html.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Brooking</title>
		<link>http://bicycledriving.org/law/guide-to-improving-laws/comment-page-1#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>John Brooking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicycledriving.org/law/guide-to-improving-laws#comment-803</guid>
		<description>In the &quot;Mandatory Bike Lane Use&quot; section, table 4 lists 7 states, but the text above lists mentions 6. NY is left out of the text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the &#8220;Mandatory Bike Lane Use&#8221; section, table 4 lists 7 states, but the text above lists mentions 6. NY is left out of the text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://bicycledriving.org/law/guide-to-improving-laws/comment-page-1#comment-743</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bicycledriving.org/law/guide-to-improving-laws#comment-743</guid>
		<description>I find the response to the motorcyclist - Dan Kennelly, Central Ohio Norton Owners - regarding licensing, to be unpersuasive.  A bicyclist on a bicycle runs as many risks, and at comparable speed creates significant risk to self &amp; others, just like a motorcycle.  Start collecting stories from cyclists &amp; pedestrians about the many folks who are injured while cycling, or being hit by cyclists.  They may not be as numerous as those created by autos or motorcycles, but they aren&#039;t mere chimera either.  Registration of bicyclists has a long history in a number of states, localities, and colleges &amp; universities.  There was a time when motorists didn&#039;t have to have licenses or registration either -- and I wouldn&#039;t be surprized to learn that motorists made the same kinds of arguments against registration &amp; licensing as some bicyclists make now.  Equal rights = equal responsibilities, up to and including registration &amp; licensing, if the governmental unit so chooses.  After all, we actually have an explicit Constitutional right to bear arms, but not ride bicycles, and yet ... many of us see no problem with registering &amp; licensing guns &amp; hunting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find the response to the motorcyclist &#8211; Dan Kennelly, Central Ohio Norton Owners &#8211; regarding licensing, to be unpersuasive.  A bicyclist on a bicycle runs as many risks, and at comparable speed creates significant risk to self &amp; others, just like a motorcycle.  Start collecting stories from cyclists &amp; pedestrians about the many folks who are injured while cycling, or being hit by cyclists.  They may not be as numerous as those created by autos or motorcycles, but they aren&#8217;t mere chimera either.  Registration of bicyclists has a long history in a number of states, localities, and colleges &amp; universities.  There was a time when motorists didn&#8217;t have to have licenses or registration either &#8212; and I wouldn&#8217;t be surprized to learn that motorists made the same kinds of arguments against registration &amp; licensing as some bicyclists make now.  Equal rights = equal responsibilities, up to and including registration &amp; licensing, if the governmental unit so chooses.  After all, we actually have an explicit Constitutional right to bear arms, but not ride bicycles, and yet &#8230; many of us see no problem with registering &amp; licensing guns &amp; hunting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
